Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind
This weekend I had the pleasure of seeing Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, the latest time-space-mashup from writer Charlie Kaufman starring Jim Carrey, Kate Winslet, Kirsten Dunst, Elijah Wood, and directed by Michel Gondry.
If you've seen either Being John Malkovich or Adaptation (also written by Kaufman) you should have a good idea of what to expect -- twisted timelines, blurred notions of reality, etc. But this go around, Kaufman has found an emotional center missing (at least for me) from his former work, namely the characters portrayed by Carrey and Winslet. At its core, Sunshine is a love story. Okay, a pretty twisted love story. But behind all the surreal imagery and fantastic plot lurks a very satisfying, rich story about two disparate people trying to supersede their own character flaws and come together.
Carrey has made a few attempts at dramatic roles, but he actually pulls it off here. There are a handful of Carrey-ish moments that must have been written in, or perhaps improvised on the spot, that remind you of his greater repertoire (if you can really call it that), but you quickly forget about his standard persona. As for Winslet, I've never particularly cared for her as an actor either, but she's superb in Sunshine as a disaffected, emotionally turbulent urbanite who obsesses over hair color and wildly spontaneous activity. Together, they somehow find a believable chemistry that works, even with all the roadblocks Kaufman throws in their path.
I could write more about the story itself, but I would hate to ruin it for anyone who hasn't seen it. If you loved, or even mildly enjoyed Malkovich or Adaptation, Sunshine should be at the top of your must-see list.
Update: Check out Steven Johnson's look into the science of the movie on Slate.
Comments
absolutely agree! a must see film. Both actors are brilliant in this, without question. Sublime script that if you don't love, well, you're dead inside. You said it well. I'm just glad I couldn't see the end coming, unlike 'passion of the christ'. I walked out of the theater mumbling 'Who knew he died at the end!'
Posted by: Lincoln at March 22, 2004 11:25 AM
Thanks for not ruining it for me (I actually scanned the post first to make sure). I have yet to see Confessions of a Dangerous Mind, also by Kaufman, but I love Adaptation and Being John Malkovitch. In my opinion some of the most creative film making ever.
Posted by: Paul Mayne at March 22, 2004 11:28 AM
I really want to see this movie.
Skimmed your review and looks like i will see it.
Thanks
-Mike
Posted by: mdipi at March 22, 2004 11:56 AM
I agree as well! I actually saw it twice yesterday! I normally don't do that but.... long story. I'm a big fan of Malkovich and Kaufman in general but found this flick to be much more emotional and sweet the the others. Definitely a Must See!
Posted by: Jay at March 22, 2004 12:02 PM
Carrey has made a few attempts at dramatic roles, but he actually pulls it off here.
Umm, didn't Carrey pull those attempts off pretty well also?
Posted by: Tomas at March 22, 2004 12:02 PM
Absoulutely agree. Early contender for best film of the year.
Posted by: Ron Lim at March 22, 2004 12:04 PM
WOW! My wife and I weren't planning on seeing a movie this weekend, but then at the spur of the moment picked this film, remembering the preview. What a great film.
I wrote up a post of my site about the film and am already seeing on other sites this is going to get a lot of online discussion. Go see it now!
Posted by: monkeyinabox at March 22, 2004 1:37 PM
Gondry and Kaufman are also responsible for Human Nature, which wasn't nearly as remarkable but definitely had its moments. Some of the wildlife scenes in that film are reminiscent of Gondry's Bjork videos and the Kaufman scriptwriting is definitely present.
Posted by: Mike at March 22, 2004 2:46 PM
Kate Winslet was amazing in Peter Jackson's finest film, Heavenly Creatures.
I thought Jim Carrey was good in Peter Weir's Truman Show as well.
I loved Eternal Sunshine. It was an almost perfect film. Jon Brion's score (he did the amazing music in a similar kind of film, P.T. Anderson's Punch-Drunk Love), great acting, nice script and nice cinematography.
I love the ending idea that you can fall in love someone by learning all the stuff that will drive you crazy about them.
Posted by: Jim Renaud at March 22, 2004 10:03 PM
I wonder to what extent they used Winslet's hair color? At the beginning, it was blue and she was wearing an orange sweatshirt - maybe to indicate that Clementine is bi-polar?
Posted by: Matt at March 23, 2004 12:10 AM
blog hopping from one great blog to another. hope you dont mind me dropping by.
im looking forward watching Enternal Sunshine. From the reviews i got so far seems like a good movie. Yet i think someone said Michel Godry is much better as a writer than being a director.
Hmmm we shall see after this weekend...
Posted by: AYEZA at March 23, 2004 6:44 AM
Great write-up. "Eternal Sunshine" was one of the most creative movies I've seen in a long time. The movie tells a great story... without the use of special effects and CGI imagery. Heck, even the lighting is poor. This story stands on its own and is worth seeing. (Good soundtrack too.)
Posted by: Scott at March 23, 2004 6:55 AM
Absolutely phenomenal. There's honestly nothing more that I can think of to say than that.
Posted by: Darin at March 23, 2004 2:49 PM
Though I love Kaufman's work, I've been looking forward to seeing Eternal Sunshine much more from the point of view that Gondry is directing. The work of director Michel Gondry (which I note that you linked) is nothing short of essential.
There's a feature interview with the duo over at the Onion AV Club, btw.
Posted by: Daithi at March 23, 2004 2:58 PM
Has anybody noticed the Lacuna website they did? Before the movie was released, there were no pictures of Carrey or any references to the movie. They really nailed it.
Posted by: Mark at March 25, 2004 12:42 AM
That's a fantastic link Mark. Very smart.
Posted by: Todd Dominey at March 25, 2004 8:56 AM
"As for Winslet, I’ve never particularly cared for her as an actor either, but she’s superb in Sunshine as a disaffected, emotionally turbulent urbanite who obsesses over hair color and wildly spontaneous activity."
Actress, not actor.
Posted by: chet at April 1, 2004 10:41 PM
It can go either way Chet. Some female "actresses" prefer to be called an "actor." Think of it this way -- you don't see female plumbers being called "plumberesses" -- they're a plumber, just like a man. Same logic applies to acting.
Posted by: Todd Dominey at April 2, 2004 8:23 AM
Scott says: “Eternal Sunshine” was one of the most creative movies I’ve seen in a long time. The movie tells a great story… without the use of special effects and CGI imagery.
Scott, I agree with everything you said in your post, although I do believe there was significant use of special effects. However, they were simple and brilliant, IMHO, and careful not to undermine the beauty of the story. My favorite effect had to be when they where running down the street past the heavy, green fence. As they ran, the fence became unhinged behind them, flying up and away before disappearing. There were many other nice moments like that, but it did not overwhelm.
Helen
P.S. Chet, as a woman who has dabbled in a few art projects, I was a bit thrown when one guy called me "quite the art-ress." OK ... new word? Admittedly, it felt a little backhanded, as if it were a tad lesser than an actual artist. Just my opinion. Take care, all.
Posted by: Helen L.F. at April 26, 2004 1:53 PM
